Showing posts with label backstamps. Show all posts
Showing posts with label backstamps. Show all posts

Thursday, 29 May 2014

Charlotte Rhead backstamps & production history framework.

Bernard Bumpus in "Collecting Rhead Pottery", identified eight backstamp styles and I continued to use his numbering system as the basis for my work on the rhead-crownducal.info website. To study the complete production of Crown Ducal requires the documentation of a much larger number of backstamps and the Bumpus numbering system is not helpful. I have previously documented dozens of backstamp styles in previous posts, But this one is an edited catalogue of backstamp types primarily for collectors of Charlotte Rhead pottery, (or more accurately, Crown Ducal tube-lined pottery).

It lists the Bumpus and rhead-crownducal.info codes alongside my own numbering system and proposes dividing the Crown Ducal tube-lining history of Crown Ducal ware into "Periods" based on the backstamps used, (and if necessary some other criteria). My purpose in doing this is to simplify time into chunks that can define when an item of Crown Ducal tube-lined pottery was made. I am preparing some other blog posts which will refer to the production history of Rhead items and I need the most concise way of doing it. Although the exact dates of these Period boundaries are unknown I will offer reasoned best estimates. Of course I would welcome any information from readers that would help to date these events more precisely.

Period 1 (approximately January 1933 -December 1934)


Period 1 is deemed to start when Charlotte arrives at the company. I have not found any documents with her start date at Richardsons, but I think that Bumpus was correct when he said early 1933. The start of 1933 would be ideal. We know that Charlottes earliest known design for Crown Ducal, Byzantine, (2681), was featured in the trade press of March 1933. January 1933 would be an excellent estimated start date and allows for the lead time prior to publication, and time for settling in and producing a quantity of her first designs.

Charlotte Rhead - Period 1 backstamps


Please note that  Period 1 represents the time while Charlotte was working at Richardsons and the company was applying these types of backstamps to their tube-lined productions. It does not mean these were the only backstamps that the company were using at this time, but they are the only ones I have seen on Charlottes tube-lined designs made until the switch to Period 2 backstamp types.

Bumpus mentions that the backstamp I refer to as type 241, (with WARE between CROWN DUCAL and ENGLAND), is used occasionally. I have never seen this backstamp on a Charlotte Rhead design.  I suspect that he saw this mark on the base of the Crown Ducal sgrafitto designs. He thought that these might be the work of Charlotte based on stylistic grounds, but I find this very difficult to believe. Why would Richardsons employ the foremost tube-lining designer of the time and have her earliest commissions be sgrafitto productions for which she had no recent commercial track record? The decoration is very sloppy compared with what she had done at Burgess and Leigh and what she would continue to do for Crown Ducal, also the colour palette used bears no relation to what she used before or after. They would have to be very early designs, as many are seen with the 1920s type 110 backstamp and therefore needed to have predated Byzantine. But it is true they were still in production once Charlotte had arrived.

There may have been Charlotte Rhead tube-lined designs with the type 110 backstamp from Period 1, but I have not conclusively identified an example. Normally this mark was applied to the small and awkward shapes like table lamps and very small items. Most of the examples I have seen were either on patterns that were introduced at the BIF in 1935 or later, or for earlier patterns like 2801 or 3274 for which the production date is ambiguous. At any rate the backstamp changeover on these awkward shapes does not follow the same Period boundaries so I will return to this subject later.

When did Period 1 end? Almost certainly towards the end of 1934 or early 1935. Here are some observations that would need to fit with any proposed Period boundary.

Less than 1% of Hydrangea, (3797), or Blue Peony, (4016), examples have Period 1 backstamps. I have not yet seen a Patch, (4015), Omar, (4036) or Persian Rose, (4040), example from Period 1. The Pottery Gazette of February 1935 talks of Hydrangea, (3797), Blue Peony, (4016) and Persian Rose, (4040) all being new patterns. The same article also discusses Stitch, (3274), an earlier design, of which about 10% of examples are from Period 1. The majority, (nearly 90%), of Granada, (3321), items are Period 1 and being an uncommon design we have to assume it did not have a long production run despite the company continuing to advertise it in early 1935.

With regard to other Crown Ducal productions from this time, the youngest pattern number seen with a Period 1 backstamp is 4183, a freehand enamelled floral tableware design on the Victory shape. Although, the single example with the early backstamp was on a lemonade jug, so perhaps the larger shape may indicate it was a prototype to show off the design, certainly all the other tableware examples I have seen of this design had Period 2 backstamps. The youngest well known tableware design, that is very rarely found from Period 1 are Charlottes Ellesmere/Wenlock/Breedon patterns, (4009/4010/4011). These fit closely in pattern number with Blue Peony and they are also discussed in the same Pottery Gazette article of February 1935; therefore, if this cluster of designs can be dated I believe that would be a good estimate of the Period 1 - Period 2 boundary.

The prototype of Blue Peony, (in Byzantine colours), that is illustrated on the late George Connors website is one of only two Blue Peony examples I have seen from Period 1. I like the idea that the prototype is Period 1, but the main production for Blue Peony was during Period 2. If the Pottery Gazette were reviewing these new designs in January and publishing in February with a view to them being seen at the British Industries Fair in March, then New Year 1935 might be a reasonable date for the changeover. One would then have to find an explanation for why there are not more examples of Hydrangea from Period 1. Perhaps because the tube-liners were all too busy completing orders for Rhodian, (3272), and Stitch, (3274), which were the two most popular tube-lined designs that straddle the Period 1 - Period 2 boundary. The company may have felt that while the staff were busy with existing orders they could hold on to Hydrangea to be part of their launch of new designs at the BIF. It is all guesswork!

Popular Charlotte Rhead tube-lined patterns designed during Period 1:
  • 2681 Byzantine
  • 2682 Lotus Leaves
  • 2691 Turin
  • 2800 Aztec
  • 2801 Byzantine/Danube
  • 3052 Persino
  • Nursery Ware
  • USA Salad Bowls and Platters
  • 3272 Rhodian
  • 3274 Stitch
  • ???? Primula (number unknown but has an almost identical production profile to Granada and therefore placed here)
  • 3321 Granada
  • 3797 Hydrangea (possibly not in commercial production until Period 2)
  • 4015 Patch (possibly not in commercial production until Period 2)
  • 4016 Blue Peony (possibly not in commercial production until Period 2)

 

Period 2 (approximately January 1935 -September 1939)

 

The four years and nine months that I allocate to Period 2 were the most productive with regard to the number of Rhead tube-lined designs and the quantity of examples produced, (as estimated by what has been seen for sale over the past few years).

Charlotte Rhead - Period 2 backstamps
 

The end of Period 2 occurs sometime after the introduction of Fruit Border, (5802), and Palermo, (5803), but before Circular Fruits, (5982). No examples of Circular Fruits or younger designs have been seen with the backstamps defining Period 2.

Fruit Border and Palermo start to appear in photographic advertisements in the Pottery Gazette from March 1939. The company usually waited a little while for designs to be popular before using them in advertisements and since there are quite a few examples, especially of Fruit Border, from Period 2 one might think that production started well before the end of 1938, however this is difficult to reconcile with other observations. The youngest tableware with Period 2 marks is the "Sunshine Salad Ware", (5787), textured with a crinkled surface radiating from the centre, with yellow glaze and orange brushed edge. This supports the premise that the Period boundary occurred soon after pattern number 5800 but does not help with a date.

Elsewhere, Tarragona, (5623), was regarded as "new" in the November 1938 issue of the Pottery Gazette whereas its pattern number might suggest it was designed in the early summer of 1938. Pattern book references to dates were rarely entered at the time of the design and are more likely to refer to subsequent correspondence with clients. There are entries for April 1938 (pattern 5572), July 1939, (pattern 5927) and January 1940 for Charlottes Trellis pattern 6016, (which is deemed an accurate date for the design).

Tableware pattern 5784 is advertised in the Pottery Gazette of  February 1939, and even without using this as a data point for age calculation the pattern design would date to January 1939. This makes me comfortable with my design date estimation. Therefore, if Fruit Border and Palermo were designed in February 1939 at the latest, and there are significant numbers with Period 2 marks, I believe the Period 2 - Period 3 boundary has to be close to the design date for Circular Fruits, (5982), and Ankara, (5983). Late summer, say, September 1939 would be about the latest possible time. This would allow a reasonable amount of time to account for the number of Fruit Border examples seen from Period 2. WW2 started in September 1939 and there may be a connection between this event and all the subsequent chaotic base markings that define Period 3. It should be noted that there are no tableware designs within the pattern number range between Sunshine Salad Ware and Circular Fruits that can support this proposal. I am hoping that this lack of evidence is because there were no new, popular tableware patterns introduced during this time that used these same backstamps.

Popular Charlotte Rhead tube-lined patterns designed during Period 2:
  • 4036 Omar
  • 4040 Persian Rose
  • 4088 Patch
  • 4100 Orange Chain
  • 4298 Green Chain
  • 4300 Tudor Rose
  • 4318 Tudor Rose
  • 4491 Tudor Rose
  • 4511 Manchu
  • 4519 Coloured Snowdrops
  • 4521 Blue Posy
  • 4538 Blossom
  • 4724 Coronation
  • 4725 Coronation
  • 4794 Blue Tulips
  • 4795 Spanish Tree
  • 4903 Stitch Variation
  • 4921 Golden Leaves
  • 4922 Florian
  • 4923 Chains and Panels
  • 4924 Carnation
  • 4926 Arabian Scroll
  • 4953 Foxglove
  • 4954 Wisteria
  • 4957 Arabian Scroll
  • 5391 Persian Leaf
  • 5393 Tudor Rose
  • 5411 Caliph
  • 5623 Tarragona
  • 5802 Fruit Border
  • 5803 Palermo

Period 3 (approximately October 1939 - June 1942)

 

World War II has begun and until 18th June 1942, when the stringent restrictions on decorated pottery were introduced, it would appear that tube-lined decorative pottery continued to be made and sold. Observations suggest that production was about 50% of pre-war levels which seems quite impressive considering the number of staff that must have left the industry and the hardships that would have curtailed spending on luxuries.
Charlotte Rhead - Period 3 backstamps

The above backstamp styles all signify a tube-lined item made during Period 3 with the exception of the small AGR8/Type 401 style which if found on a small item or lamp may mean a different date, (see section on small and awkward shapes).

The Period 3 styles were not applied randomly. I have mentioned clusters of various types for various patterns in my Backstamps - Part 3 post, but I do not feel confident enough to elaborate further on how or why the marks come to be distributed in this way.

The initial tube-lined designs of Period 3 were Circular Fruits, (5982) and Ankara, (5983). These were supplemented by Trellis, (6106), at the beginning of 1940 and Mexican, (6189), in the summer of 1940. Basket, (6198) and Fruits and Leaves, (6353) followed but made a more modest contribution. The rest of the production consisted of older popular designs, particularly Golden Leaves, (4921, which is the most commonly found pattern from Period 3. The other favourites at this time were Persian Leaf, (5411),  Caliph, (5411), Tarragona, (5623), Fruit Border, (5802) and Palermo, (5803).

An interesting point to note is that several of Charlottes earlier designs reappear or continued in production at this time, but almost exclusively on chargers, Byzantine, (2681), Rhodian, (3272), Blue Peony, (4015), Green Chain, (4298), Tudor Rose, (4491), Manchu, (4511) and Arabian Scroll, (4926) all fit into this category.

The end of Period 3 marks the intensifying of the restrictions on the sale of decorated pottery in the United Kingdom. This process began in October 1941 and Bernard Bumpus is vague about exactly when Charlotte left the company. He is sure that Charlotte was at HJ Wood Ltd by July 1942. I doubt that much new design work would have occurred after October 1941, so it is possible that Charlotte could have left any time between October 1941 and June 1942. For the present I shall keep June 1942 as the big changeover date as it ties in with the government restrictions on decorated pottery which would deny an outlet for the work of an experienced designer like Charlotte. It would also force the departure for most of Charlottes team of skilled decorators, and oblige the company to introduce a single backstamp style.

Popular Charlotte Rhead tube-lined patterns designed during Period 3:
  • 5982 Fruit Border
  • 5983 Ankara
  • 6016 Trellis
  • 6189 Mexican
  • 6198 Basket
  • 6353 Fruits and Leaves

Period 4 (approximately July 1942 - August 1952)

 

Periods 4, 5 & 6 represent time when Charlotte was no longer involved with Crown Ducal and the majoity of it was after her death. But it is important to document these marks as they are found on examples of her designs.

Please note that the backstamps marked AGR5 for Periods 3 and 4 are different. A casual glance and you may think they are the same but the details of the crown/plumes/crest differ. Each one defines a distinctly different time period.

The dates July 1942 - August 1952 are the core period of the wartime government restrictions on decorated pottery. The Period 4 backstamp style, type 481 is known to be from this time as it can be found with the printed letter "B" which is the AG Richardson & Co. Ltd price band indicator for tableware made while these restrictions were in force. I do not have any other evidence that these are the start and end dates when this backstamp was used. There is a possibility that the backstamp continued to be used into 1953. Quite a few hand decorated plates have been seen, signed and dated on the reverse and one example has the type 481 backstamp and is dated 1953. Because there is no direct link to the factory or company information, we have no way of knowing if these are Crown Ducal productions or the work of a hobbyist or a student decorating blank plates.


Charlotte Rhead - Period 4 backstamp

Patterns found from this Period fall into one of two categories the post-Rhead era designs, 6567, 6568, 6569, 6570, 6571, 6572 and 6573, or earlier Charlotte Rhead designs that had remained popular and continued to be made after she had left the company.

The most common Rhead designs are Persian Rose, (4040), Golden Leaves, (4921), Fruit Border, 5802) and Ankara, (5983). Others known to exist are Rhodian, (3272), Tudor Rose, (4491), Tarragona, (5623), Circular Fruits, (5982), Trellis, (6106), Mexican, (6189) and Fruits and Leaves, (6353). The Nursery Ware patterns Who Said Dinner, (3131) and Little Boy Blue, (3133), also remained in production.

No examples have the facsimile Rhead signature, though they often have the pattern number tube-lined and the mark of the tube-liner. The two marks most often seen are L or a simple dot. Occasionally seen are 11 and 111.


Period 5 (approximately September 1952 - late 1950s)

 

I have not found much period documentation to help with this mark except for an article entitled Crown Ducal at Home in the magazine Pottery and Glass from 1955. In it are illustrated the reintroduced version of Green Chain, (4298), and the pink and grey version of Ankara, (6778). Hand decorated plates exist signed and dated from 1959 with this mark. Therefore after Period 4, I believe it is likely that most of the remainder of the 1950s can be categorised Period 5.

Charlotte Rhead - Period 5 backstamp


In the Collecting Rhead Pottery book by Bernard Bumpus he wrote that this mark was used from 1933. It is difficult to understand what he was thinking about. A possible connection is that Charlottes orange and black stitched edge tableware, (pattern 3049), and some nursery ware remained in production for decades and examples have been seen with the Period 5 backstamp. Those designs date to 1933, but backstamps define the date of production not design, so perhaps that was his error.

Similar to Period 4, patterns are either post-Rhead era designs, 6778, 6822, 6884, 6907, 6918, 6927 and 7065, or earlier Charlotte Rhead designs that had remained popular and continued to be made after she had left the company. During Period 5 these were 3131, 3133, 4040, 4298, 4921, 5803 (pink version) and 5983.

Again, as for Period 4, no examples have the facsimile Rhead signature, though they often have the pattern number tube-lined and the mark of the tube-liner. The marks most often seen are L, a simple dot, 11 and 111.


Period 6 (approximately late 1950s - early 1960s)

 

This is the youngest mark seen on Crown Ducal tube-lined pottery and I have not found any documentation to help with its date range. Hand decorated plates dated 1960 exist with this backstamp and Bernard Bumpus in his book writes that "production did continue until at least 1962". Hopefully there may be some Crown Ducal advertisements in the trade journals or general press that may help link patterns to dates and marks.

Charlotte Rhead - Period 6 backstamp


Both Bumpus and Shaw  have a start date of mid 1930s for this mark in their publications and I have no idea what they were looking at.

Post-Rhead era patterns 6778, 6907, 6927, 7065 and 7069 may have this mark, (there are also some unnumbered, tube-lined designs with post war glazes and colours, all experiments from the late 50s-early 60s). One or two Golden Leaves, (4921), chargers have been seen with this backstamp and marked L, also a nursery ware plate of Little Boy Blue, (3133).

The Little Boy Blue Plate, is proof that this is the Charlotte Rhead design with the longest production history, 1933 until possibly 1962? At least twenty six, maybe almost thirty years - I think Charlotte would be proud.


Small and Awkward Shapes

 

Table lamps, condiment dishes and vases with very small bases tend not to have backstamps that conform to the rules outlined above. Although it is possible to construct a separate scheme for them, there are several examples that do not obey the rules and the sample size of observations is rather small.

Charlotte Rhead backstamps on small  & awkward shaped items

Type 110 are the oldest group. Seen to date on lamps and condiment dishes with the youngest pattern being Tudor Rose, (4491). The full list of pattern seen is 2801, 3274, 3797, 4088, 4100 & 4491 which would take us from 1933 into 1936.

Type 401 appeared in 1936 and continued to be used until at least the beginning of the wartime restrictions on decorated pottery. It has been found with patterns 3797, 4088, 4491, 4511, 4921, 6016 and 6189.

Type 403 is found only on items produced in the post-Rhead era, reintroductions of 4040, 5983, and later designs 6568 and 6778.

However several post-Rhead era shapes and patterns have been found with type 401, so be careful and use other criteria in conjunction with the backstamp to date an item with type 401.

End note

 

I hope my reasoning is comprehensible and that this will be a useful framework for documenting the production history of Charlottes Crown Ducal designs. If previously unseen period documents, anecdotal evidence or a pot with markings that do not fit the model mean the period boundaries dates need changing - then so be it.



Friday, 9 May 2014

Crown Ducal backstamps. Part 3, from the mid/late 1930s until 1952


Here we have part three of my Crown Ducal backstamp styles research. This section documents the styles used from before the start of WW2 until the end of the UK restrictions on decorated pottery in 1952.

As in the previous sections, I have numbered the backstamp styles for my own cataloguing purposes and they do not reference the work of anyone else. Also the usual caveats apply that this is a work in progress based on observations rather than documentary evidence - of which I haven't found any of use.

Part 1 approx 1915-1929

Part 2 approx 1929-1936
http://rhead-crownducal.blogspot.co.uk/2013/07/crown-ducal-backstamps-part-2-mostly.html

Through the mid 1930s until around 1938 the company had a quite simple regime of using mostly printed backstamp styles according to the tableware shape range, design style or a standard stamp for their fancies. Then during the summer of 1936 more styles start to appear. I ended part 2 of the backstamp blog with a special printed style for Charlotte Rheads snow glaze tableware. 

From 1936 there were some more new backstamp styles introduced. The plain little MADE IN ENGLAND, type 401, is believed to have originally been created to replace the use of type 110 on small or awkward shaped items. The company continued to use the 1920s style on lamps and small condiment dishes up until the end of 1935 as witnessed by its use on Charlotte Rhead patterns Orange Chain, (4100), and Tudor Rose, (4491). From 1936 onward the lamps tend to get marked with the backstamp type 401.
Type 401

A special version of this simple backstamp, type 402, was created for mugs designed for the Coronation of Edward VIII. The short mugs have REGD. NO. 813982 and the tall mugs REGD. NO. 813982.


Type 402

Sometime in 1939 when Charlottes Persian Leaf, (5391) and Caliph, (5411), patterns are in full production there is a short period when the simple MADE IN ENGLAND, type 401, gets put on any shape of Rhead tube-lined pattern and a lot of tableware too. I have never understood why the company produced ware without their own company name or trade mark on it. WW2 was approaching so there is a strong possibility that all sorts of upheavals were occurring for businesses. Perhaps the employees who made the base mark prints joined the war effort and Richardsons just had to carry on with the staff and materials they had to hand to continue production.

Type 411
Again, in 1936 another backstamp design, (type 411), was produced, this time a self coloured lithograph, (transfer), and was applied mostly to their white glazed Avon range tableware. The general style of this backstamp will be familiar to those who have seen very early Crown Ducal ware, and I described many versions of the strap and buckle style in my blog on backstamps – part 1. The style presented here is distinctly different for many reasons but the most obvious is the addition of MADE IN ENGLAND that follows the bottom curvature of the strap. This is a characteristic of all the strap and buckle designs from the mid 1930s onwards.

Type 412
The Empress pattern, (4746), would be a good example of one of the earlier designs that used it, but any Avon shaped ware, typically with coloured bands, floral transfers and printed repeating motif borders in gold are likely to have this style. My instinct tells me that this self coloured lithograph backstamp may have been created to replace all other backstamp styles. I have seen this style used on freehand enamel tableware patterns and even Charlotte Rhead tube-lined fancies, specifically patterns 5623, 5802 and 5803. Frequently the lithograph backstamp type 411, was accompanied by the small MADE IN ENGLAND print backstamp, type 401. When they occur together, I name the grouping backstamp type 412 because there may be some significance of the pairing I have yet to grasp. This duplication was a very common occurrence so there must have been a purpose for it. Perhaps the MADE IN ENGLAND in the lithograph was too prone to damage or was just regarded as too small so it had to be supplemented. But it appears to have ended up being predominantly used on items with lithographs in their design, either floral borders and centres or all over chintz patterns.

In 1938 there appears a whole new series of printed, strap and buckle versions specifically for particular print and enamel patterns. I group these as type 421. I have seen them on patterns Dell, (5636), Malvern, (5645), Bewdley, (5646), Delamere, (5647), Ganges, (5755), Devon, (5797), Vale, (5821), Tabor, (5963), and Andover, (5966).

Various examples of type 421
The pattern name and number often seem to be an integral part of the backstamp print., but for some patterns the name and number are above the trade mark and for others, below. The details of the strap and buckle styles are all slightly different so I suppose each pattern has its own printed backstamp style but I'm not going to create a new type number for each pattern! Also, this series needs further study because examples of Dell have been seen with different versions. Not all designs were given names and so there are examples that fall into the type 421 category without names or numbers in the backstamp.

So more observations and thought are needed here and for the time being I am reserving type 421 as a group container for late 1930s, (and early 1940s?), print and enamel designs. Furthermore, be aware not to confuse them with post war named print and enamel design - Type 661 shown below.

Type 661
Jumping ahead to the mid 1950s a very similar style is adopted for post war print and enamel designs like Peover, (6514), Wilmslow, (6515), Rydal, (6591) and Selby. I am inserting them here so readers are aware of the differences. The younger versions tend to be crisper in outline, (possibly commercially produced lithographs), pattern numbers are absent and there is often the text HAND COLOURED UNDERGLAZE above the crown and crest.

Back to late 1938, to recap, (refer back to part 2 of the backstamp blog for details):
  • Most Charlotte Rhead tube-lined items and other fancies will be marked with type 245
  • Tableware on Victory shape has type 246
  • Tableware on Cotswold shape has type 247
  • Tableware on Queen Anne shape has type 252 or 253
  • Tableware on Avon shape will probably have the new lithograph type 411 and most likely with the addition of the type 401 MADE IN ENGLAND.
  • Other tableware ranges such as Gem or Premier will likely have type 245
  • Small items and awkward shapes will have type 401
  • Snow glaze tableware will have type 261
  • Floral print and enamel designs from Dell, 5636), onwards have their own variation of type 421
Then as we approach or begin 1939 a significant number of items get marked with only type 401. This includes a lot of Charlottes tube-lined designs particular 4016, 4491, 4921, 5391, 5411 and 5623. If my deductions are correct then this provides a neat snapshot of which Rhead patterns were popular at that time.

In early 1939 when Fruit Border, (5802) and Palermo, (5803), were introduced the company flirted with the idea of using the lithograph, type 411 on Rhead items. I have only seen 5 examples, two on 5803, one on 5802 and two on Tarragona, (5623). I don't think it worked well, perhaps the uneven mottled glazes did not suit the delicate detail of the lithograph. The supporting evidence for the timing of these backstamp changeovers is that the youngest Crown Ducal patterns seen with type 245 backstamps are Sunshine Salad Ware, (5787), Fruit Border, (5802) and Palermo, (5803).

So, in 1939 type 411/412 seems to remain the standard for mostly white glazed Avon shape, and the new print and enamel tableware patterns get individually designed printed backstamps from the type 421 style group. But it is not that simple, there is yet another group of styles that are to be found on lithograph and print and enamel tableware which like the 421 group is a work in progress for me. I name them type 415, but the details of the script letters can be different so it is a collection of similar styles. I believe they are lithographs but  I can't be certain.

Various examples of type 415
Examples of this style have been seen on print and enamel designs ranging from pattern 4561 to 5971 and Avon shaped tableware with white glaze with or without lithograph decoration from pattern 5055 to 5212. Such a range of patterns makes it difficult to place it in sequence especially as these patterns have been seen with other backstamps.

A new lithograph is crafted for fancies, particularly Charlotte Rhead patterns - type 461.

Type 461
Type 461 is larger and simpler than type 411 and so probably has a better chance of being legible on mottled glazes. The patterns it is most likely to be found on are 5982, 5983 and 6016 which would date its use to early 1940. It has been seen on over a dozen designs on fancies, (mostly tube-lined), but this is not a common backstamp style and could not have been in use for more than a few months at most.

There are two more backstamp styles found on Crown Ducal Rhead items that have facsimile signatures, (implying they were made while Charlotte was still working  for the company).

Type 471

Type 472

Type 465

Type 471 is yet another printed strap and buckle design, it is the most common style found on Rhead items from this period of the late 30s early 40s, although I have yet to see it on a signed piece with patterns 6189, 6198 or 6353. It is most commonly found on patterns 5623, 5802, 5982, 5983 and 6016, as well as lots of earlier designs with extended production runs. A version of type 471 with the addition of the registration number for the Cotswold shape tableware defines type 472 and is presumably a replacement for type 247.

Type 465 is most common on patterns 6016 and 6189. There are quite a few examples also on 5802, 5982, 5983 and importantly, all signed examples of 6189, 6198 and 6353.

It is extremely difficult to be certain about any of this. The observations are clear that there are distinct clusters of Rhead patterns with these short lived backstamp styles, (types 401, 411, 461 and 465),  and yet there is an overwhelming number of examples with the type 471 style. It is impossible to create a sequence where type 471 slots in between a pair of the other styles. I think the best explanation is that when type 245 stopped being used in early 1939, and the use of the lithograph type 411 proved impractical, the company introduced the print type 471, they dabbled with type 461 for a little while but stopped using it, reverting to 471, then tried type 465 until the government introduced the restrictions on decorated pottery and the company had to settle on one style only for all its ware, and that was yet another variation of  the strap and buckle style.

This is a good time to mention a paper which helps to put in perspective what was going on in the pottery industry during the war.

In the Journal of the Northern Ceramic Society Volume 12 from 1995 there is a paper entitled Ten Plain Years: The British Pottery Industry 1942-1952 by Kathy Niblett.

It explains the rules and consequences to the Staffordshire potteries of concentrating production to a reduced number of factories in order to save materials, energy and labour as these were needed elsewhere for the war. The process was initiated in the autumn of 1941, but by the summer of 1942 they were extended to restrict the sale of decorated pottery in the home market. Some restrictions were relaxed in 1945 and subsequent years but they were not fully lifted until August 1952.

The gist of the paper with regard to A G Richardson and Co Ltd is that in 1941 the company was designated a “Nucleus Firm” by the Board of Trade. This meant it was able to continue production at its own site, (The Gordon Pottery, Tunstall), but that the work done at the Britannia Pottery in Cobridge would be moved to Tunstall. This “concentration” of the industry was a restructuring to allow people to leave the the pottery trade to work in the armed forces or industries in demand for the war effort. Decorated pottery required a lot of man-hours and energy costs for extra firing in the kilns. These were to become luxuries generally denied to the home market, but some production would continue for sale abroad in order to earn foreign currency. The domestic market would soon get used to plain, undecorated tableware.

My understanding is that the rules were strict and even a backstamp could be deemed decoration and so the company would not be using a large number of styles at this time. Each company was allotted a price band that their ware could be sold for. Richardsons price band for tableware was "B", and one can occasionally find tableware with a backstamp accompanied by the letter B. This would indicate that the ware was made during the period of price controls from June 1942 until August 1952.


Type 481

 
Type 482

Type 481 appears to be the general style that Richardsons used during the period of the war time pottery restrictions, (1942-1952). Type 482 is the same mark but found with the letter "B" denoting the price band for tableware. They are very similar to type 471 except that the crest plumes are slightly different and there are no pierced holes in the crown beneath the plumes.

For small and awkward shaped items of Crown Ducal produced at this time the company used a modified form of  type 401 with the addition of A.G.R. which I have named type 405.

Type 405
This brings to a close my review of the backstamp styles used until the ending of the WW2 pottery restrictions in 1952. Please treat all this as my best guess. There are bound to be errors and omissions.

For post 1952 productions I have not started to record what was used on tableware. It will probably be the most difficult as there are hardly any numbered patterns with which to build a reference framework for age determination. For the fancies, we know that a new style was introduced sometime between August 1952 and the beginning of 1955, here named type 501. This backstamp will be familiar to collectors of tube-lined Crown Ducal pottery that was made after the war. Particularly the pink and grey enamelled designs, 6778, 6822, 6884, 6907, 6918 and 6927. The Pink Palermo design which carries the original 5803 pattern number and later productions of Persian Rose, 4040, Green Chain, 4298 and Golden Leaves, 4921 can also be found with this backstamp. A couple of the nursery ware patterns Who Said Dinner?, 3131 and Little Boy Blue, 3133 also continued in production and have this mark.


Type 501
As an end note I feel quite chuffed to have discovered a technique for confirming if a tube-lined piece of Crown Ducal was made whilst Charlotte was still at Richardsons or if it was made after she had left the company. Assuming Charlotte departed around the time when the the Board of Trade restrictions were introduced along with most of her colleagues, and the backstamp syle, (type 481), was introduced around the same time, and the backstamp is legible; then there appears to be a test to determine if an item was made whilst Charlotte was still an employee.

I have tested several examples, and apart from the legibility issue of smudgy backstamps, all those that I have seen with distinctive type 471 or 481 styles do pass the test. That is to say, age determination by backstamp type supports the results of other tests based on pattern, shape and the tube-lined markings. So collectors can remain calm, the discovery has not revealed any surprises. So hopefully all those ambiguous examples with the old AGR5 group style backstamp, without signatures, can have their age categorised with more confidence. Where it has proved to be most helpful is in the dating of nursery ware which rarely have base markings other than the backstamp. Also examples of the simpler designs like Circular Fruits, (5982), which often did not get marked by the tube-liner and remained in production throughout the war can now be dated more precisely.

I am open to being shown wrong. If you have an example of tube-lined pottery with backstamp type 481 with a facsimile Rhead signature please let me know. Similarly if you have a tube-lined piece with a type 471 and it has a pattern number greater than 6353 I would like to know.

The email address is on the rhead-crownducal.info website.

Left, type 471 Charlotte Rhead era - Right, type 481 post Charlotte Rhead era





Thursday, 25 July 2013

Crown Ducal backstamps. Part 2, mostly pre-WW2 1930s

This is part 2 of my Crown Ducal backstamp styles research and covers the early 1930s and more recently for some styles. If you missed part 1, click on this link:

Richardsons introduced several new tableware shapes during the early 1930s, many with their own backstamps. That is why the date range in the title is ambiguous. Backstamps specific to certain shapes, (such as Gainsborough, Florentine, Premier and Queen Anne), will have been created in the 1930's and then developed until 1950s, 60s and 70s, whereas other shapes were given generic marks depending on when they were manufactured. So my objective here is to look mainly at the backstamps of the 1930's until before World War 2, but some, (relating to specific shapes) , may represent  manufacturing times until the company ceased trading in 1974.

I need to emphasise that this is all a work in progress. The content of this post is all based on observation and inference. I have not discovered any documents of the period that record backstamp styles.

As in part 1, I have numbered the backstamp styles for my own cataloguing purposes and they do not reference the work of anyone else. The type numbers are based on age, style and shape ranges so there is no particular structure or significance to their order. Dates are rough guides only. 



Left, type 109 and right, type 110

As a reminder of what the main backstamps in use were during 1929 the two most commonly found are: type 109 for high gloss glaze lustre ware and type 110 for virtually everything else, tableware and fancies.

Registration Numbers

Before I start with more backstamps, I think it is important to say something about the registration numbers that are often on the base of Crown Ducal items as they are usually an integral part of the backstamp design. These numbers show that the owner of the original design had it registered with the, Board of Trade to try and prevent the copying of successful styles by competitors. The numbers were assigned sequentially and can therefore be dated. The date of the registration number is the date of when the design was registered NOT when the item was made or in most cases even when the pattern was designed. The item would have been made after that date, but not simply anytime after that date.

The oldest and youngest possible manufacturing date for an item depends on the production period for the pattern. For Crown Ducal art pottery and tableware this information is not known with much accuracy, although it is possible to make an educated guess based on design dates, backstamp styles and advertising material of the period. (That perhaps, will be the subject of another post once I understand it better myself!).

Design dates are best determined from the Crown Ducal pattern number. There is a java applet which calculates Crown Ducal design dates for pattern numbers between 2681 and 6353 here:

I wrote this some time ago and it is not particularly accurate, but it gives a reasonable estimate for most pattern numbers within that range used for Charlotte Rhead designs, or any Crown Ducal pattern within that range.

If you would like to know the date of a registration number, it can be calculated from the information on this website:

If you would like to see the original documents of what these registration numbers refer to then you will need to visit The National Archives at Kew, (these documents are not available online):
http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/default.htm
Although fascinating to see, they are not particulaly infomative, just a drawing or photograph.

Registration numbers do not really serve any useful purpose, except to help identify a pattern or shape range. But if you feel compelled to use the registration number for any purpose you will need to know what the number is registering and with regard to Crown Ducal it can be one of two things:
  1. The TABLEWARE SHAPE range.
  2. The actual PATTERN on the ware.
Here is list of Crown Ducal registration numbers. There may be more than this, but these are the ones I know of. 

A consecutive series of six numbers assigned to the Carnival print and enamel design by Norman Keats. The version illustrated in the documents is the matt black ground version with blue interior, but the same numbers can appear on the orange lustre versions. I am assuming that the registration is for the lantern pattern, not the shapes so it seems rather strange why several numbers were needed. There were a lot more shapes produced with this design than the six illustrated. Perhaps each number refers to the arrangement of the pattern as well as the pattern itself. That's a project for collectors of the Carnival pattern!
706196 = PATTERN CARNIVAL on a vase (Jun 1924)
706197 = PATTERN CARNIVAL on a bulb bowl (Jun1924)
706198 = PATTERN CARNIVAL on a rose bowl (Jun1924)
706199 = PATTERN CARNIVAL on a flower pot (Jun1924)
706200 = PATTERN CARNIVAL on a coffee set items (Jun1924)
706201 = PATTERN CARNIVAL on a ewer and basin (Jun1924)

Richardsons must have learnt a lesson after the registration of Carnival because the Red Tree pattern only gets two numbers. Although I still do not understand why more than one number is needed.
711270 = PATTERN 1211 RED TREE on dinner set items (Feb1925)
711271 = PATTERN 1211 RED TREE on tea set items (Feb1925)

732597 = TABLEWARE SHAPE REGENT (Oct1927)
742838 = PATTERNS 1698 & 1699 (Jan1929)
749657 = TABLEWARE SHAPE GAINSBOROUGH (Oct1929)
752078 = PATTERN LONDON CRIES (Feb1930)
762054 = PATTERN 1915 RED POPPY (Feb1931)
762055 = TABLEWARE SHAPE PREMIER (Feb1931)
778200 = PATTERN 2546 MEADOWSWEET (Nov 1932)
778201 = PATTERN 2545 HAPPY DAYS (Nov 1932)
780964 = PATTERNS 2649 SUNBURST (Mar 1933)
780965 = PATTERNS 2633 ROSEMARY, (& 2534 & 2635?) (Mar 1933)
780966 = TABLEWARE SHAPE VICTORY (Mar 1933) (780960 was applied to the ware!)
784158 = TABLEWARE SHAPE COTSWOLD (Jul 1933)
796148 = TABLEWARE SHAPE QUEEN ANNE (Sep 1934)
813982 = EDWARD VII SHORT CORONATION MUG
813983 = EDWARD VII TALL CORONATION MUG

Returning to the subject of backstamps

Gainsborough
 
Type 201
The first new backstamp style comes with the arrival of the Gainsborough shape for tableware. The design registration number for Gainsborough is 749657 which dates to the autumn of 1929 and this correlates well with when publicity starts to appear for the shape in the Pottery Gazette. I have found five backstamps specific to Gainsborough, and there is one that I am reasonably confident was used from 1929 and that I have named type 201. The earliest known pattern number for a Gainsborough design, (that I know of), is 1760 which is the design where the bramble embossment is overlain with a lithograph of the same pattern to colour it in autumnal shades of brown.

Type 202
There is a very similar style, (type 202), with the words U.S.A. PATENT APPLIED FOR instead of RD NO 749657. I presume that the company was encouraged by Gainsborough sales in the USA and modified the backstamp for items to be sold in that market. The rest of the script and crown look very similar and the patterns that it is seen on include most of the early ones from 1929/1930, so I am guessing it was created soon after the original style, but I do not have any particular evidence to support this.
 
Type 203
The third style, (type 203), has similar text to the original but with the insertion of “Made in” to precede “England”. I believe this is a later version because the text font is closer to that used for the companys other backstamps of the 1930s and it is found particularly on later Gainsborough designs that were not introduced until much later in the 1930s. There is also a version in the same text style as type 203 but without the words "Made in", (ie similar to type 201 but less crisp text). This is type 204 and may possibly have been created to put on smaller shapes like the bottom of teas and coffee cups, or, was a precursor to type 203.
Type 205
This Gainsborough backstamp is not only unique to the shape style but also the pattern series named "Rural England". It looks similar to type 201 with the addition of the name Rural England above and a small version of the print design on the front with its name of the house or village below. The prints for the Rural England series themselves were used by Crown Ducal on many of their tableware ranges from the 1930s possibly until the 1960s. I believe the Gainsborough Rural England series with this backstamp style are from the early 1930s, but there is uncertainty, so this needs more research.

Cries of London

Type 211

A backstamp style specific to one lithograph frieze design for a range of tableware items including a teapot and stand, biscuit barrel, jug, butter dish and octagonal bowl. The range was called “Cries of London” and the backstamp includes the registration number. 752078 which would date the design to early 1930. It is unknown for how long the pattern remained in production or the pattern number that was used. It is highly likely that the lithograph for the Cries of London pattern was re-used throughout the 1930s and into the 40s and 50s but these later productions may not have used this original backstamp.

Florentine


The earliest pattern number known on the Florentine shape is 1954 which would date the introduction of the range to early 1930, quite soon after Gainsborough. So it is not surprising that the backstamp styles are similar, although I have yet to see a registration number for Florentine, or perhaps it was never given one.

Type 222

Type 223

Type 224
As for Gainsborough I believe the fine script version with the USA PATENT APPLIED FOR text is the earliest version and probably for the USA market. Type 224 is not often seen, it may be the precursor to type 223 or originally made for smaller items. Generally though,  type 223 is the one most likely to be found. The Florentine shape remained in production well into the 1960s and so the backstamp alone is not going to be much use in dating an item.

Premier

The Premier shape, also known as "Old Hall Ivory Ware", has the registration number 762055 and this dates the shape design to the spring of 1931. You will find a wide variety of backstamp styles on this shape and I cannot fathom the rules of how they were used. Type 231 is used in the beginning for the earliest productions but soon after that you find Types 110, 241, 242 and 245 used, (except for specific designs like Bristol). I have made up a story that goes like this. The company creates a new shape, Premier, and at the time they are doing well in the USA market selling Gainsborough and Florentine ware. Someone has the idea to create a separate brand "Old Hall Ivory Ware" to appeal to the fashion in the USA market. Backstamps styles are created, the range sells well. Within that range the Bristol pattern is enormously popular, it get its own version of the backstamp, as does the Countryside series, (see Rural England series under Gainsborough). It is realised that the company is marketing their ware without the company name on it, especially in the home market so items get marked with existing backstamps such as type 110. Soon after that it is regarded as not acceptable to make a stamp with just "England" on it, it has to say "Made in England". Unlike other shape ranges they do not make a new version of Old Hall backstamps, but use another more general style for most patterns and revamp the style for Bristol. It could all be nonsense! One day someone will make sense of it all!

Type 231
Type 231 is the original style probably used for the first couple of years 1931-1932.

Type 232
 Type 232 was used specifically for the Countryside series.

Type 233
Type 233 is believed to be the earliest Bristol style from 1931-1932.

Type 235
Type 235 is the most commonly found on Bristol items and is believed to have used through most of the 30s, 40s and possibly early 50s.
Type 237
 Type 237 is for later Bristol production, probably from late 50's 60s or even 70s.

Type 239
Because the A.G.R is absent, this style, type 239, may represent production after the company was taken over in 1974.

I have not spent much time on studying Bristol marks so there are bound to be corrections necessary. Documenting the sequence of backstamp styles for Bristol would be a worthwhile exercise as the pattern was in production for such a large part of Crown Ducal history from 1931 until 1974. The long production period is confirmed by newspaper advertisements from 1974 still promoting Bristol pattern dinner services The backstamp without A.G.R in the mark suggesting that the pattern might still have been in production after Richardsons had ceased to exist as a separate company lends additional support.

USA Commemoratives

I am going to group these together. I do not have much knowledge of these patterns as they are obviously rare in the UK and there is no publicity material for them in the UK either. The Washington bicentenary must date to 1932 and I believe the Colonial Times range does as well. Probably the others are from the 1930s too. They are all based on the single printed colour pictorial style of design and can usually be found in different colours typically blue, pink and mulberry, (and more rarely green).

The most commonly found are The Washington Bicentenary, Colonial Times and Scenes of Old New Orleans. Other, rarer designs are known to exist that were especially commissioned by towns or businesses in the USA usually to promote their historical interest.


Type 301

Type 302

Type 311

Type 331

Type 332

Type 333
Type 341

A period of change

It is now time to take a break from the backstamp styles specific to shapes or pattern ranges. During 1929, the range of styles was fairly simple, some of the lustre ware had type 109, virtually everything else had type 110 unless you had your hands on an item of Spectria Flambe which had its own style. Then within a period of less than two years Richardsons successfully  introduces three new shapes, Gainsborough, Florentine and Premier with their own backstamps. I think it is safe to assume that fancies and earlier tableware ranges, (Regent, Ionic and Gem), continued to use the existing styles, but a change happens sometime towards the end of 1932 or the beginning of 1933.

This is close to the time that Charlotte Rhead starts working for the company, but that is probably just a coincidence. There are other big events taking place, a new managing director, purchase of the Britannia Pottery and the introduction of the Victory shape to name a few.

The change is recorded by the appearance of a new backstamp that has a very short period of use. It is found on patterns particularly with numbers in the 2350-2550 range. It is also seen of course on older patterns with long production runs such as Red Tree (1211) and Pinafore (2107). Popular patterns from the range 2350-2650  can be found with backstamps type 110, 241 and 242, but the key is that type 241 occurs in that small cluster of pattern numbers and is not restricted to a particular shape range.
Type 241
Patterns you are most likely to find with type 241 are the printed Crocus and Snowdrops (2361 & 2362), block coloured fancies (2373 and several others), freehand floral (2398), Happy Days (2545) and freehand floral (2628).

The youngest designs which have type 110 come from  the same  pattern number range but are more common and so extend to a slightly younger date. The youngest seen are the freehand floral patterns 2711 and 2745 on the Victory shape. Both patterns have been seen where items in the same set are marked with types 110 and 242. This will because of whatever lag there is in collating sets of tableware after the manufacturing, distribution and warehousing processes. I doubt it will ever be possible to determine a precise cutoff when one backstamp gets replaced by another.

It should be noted that type 110 had a second life to mark small and awkward shapes where there was no room for the newer, larger marks until well into the mid 1930s. So if you come across a Charlotte Rhead table lamp or condiment set with type 110, this is normal. It does not mean that Charlotte was working at the factory in the 20s or that you have a fake item.

Type 242
Type 242 becomes the standard style for most ware with the exception of those shapes  that have their own unique marks, (Gainsborough, Florentine and Queen Anne, and the early period for Premier/Old Hall). Victory and Cotswold items have the same mark but usually with the addition of the appropriate registration number.

Type 245
Type 245 takes over from 242 in early 1935 and becomes one of the most commonly found styles known to collectors of Charlotte Rhead fancies from her peak production period from 1935 to 1938. In general, type 245 stops being used in 1939, although there are some, as yet, unexplained exceptions to this rule.

Victory

The Victory shape was introduced early in 1933, it has the registration number 780960 on the base. (Although the documents at Kew record the design as No 760966). Apart from some very early examples with type 110, most of the first couple of years production have type 243, or sometimes there is no registration number, type 242. Then around 1935 the words "Made in" get added to form type 246. As a general rule, type 246 stops being used sometime around 1939.

Type 243

Type 246

Cotswold

The Cotswold shape, similar to Victory but moulded with the ribbed texture of a hand thrown pot, is also introduced in 1933. It has the registration number 784158. Type 244 is found on early items 1933 -1935 and type 247 on items made after 1935. As a general rule, type 247 stops being used sometime around 1939.
Type 244

Type 247
So, I hear you ask, why do some Charlotte Rhead pots have the Cotswold registration number and others do not? On my rhead-crownducal.info website I alluded to a possible reason being something to do with items for export. I do not think this is a valid explanation now. It is much more likely to have something to do with the Cotswold shape itself. During the early years, around 1933-1935, most of Charlottes tableware, and the large bowls and platters for the USA market were the Cotswold shape and so would have been given the registration number. Also, many of the vase and bowl shapes from this period had the same ribbed effect, (129, 133, 145, 148, 164 and 168 to mention a few), so you could say they were Cotswold shape too. But the application of the registration number to fancies was far less rigorous than for tableware.  I believe that shape 192 is the highest shape number seen with the Cotswold registration number and this makes sense because the new shapes that were introduced in 1935/6  like 198, 199, 207, 209 do not have the Cotswold ribbed effect. It think it would have been too much bother to apply different backstamps to the fancies depending on their shape number and therefore they stopped using the registration number for all fancies; but the company continued to use it for Cotswold tableware.

Queen Anne

A shape that may also be referred to as "Adaptation of Early English" as that is what appears on the backstamp. A fluted shape for tableware that is not very common in the UK. It has the registration number 796148 which dates the shape to the summer of 1934. I have recorded five backstamp styles on Queen Anne tableware, one is a variation of a standard 1930's mark  but because it has the Queen Anne registration number it should be recorded here. There is not really a date order except date type 251 precedes those with registration numbers and type 255 is quite young possibly late 50s at the earliest with the mention of dishwasher safe ceramic prints and glazes.

Types 254 and 255 are specific to the Ivy pattern, another single print colour design that was particularly popular in the USA. Sometimes the pattern gets named Joy, I understand the script style is difficult to read - but trust me, the pattern is named Ivy in the Crown Ducal pattern books. The pattern books do record the design numbers for each colour, blue-green (4012), pink (4013), Old English blue (4014), grey (4035), Cobalt blue with gold edge (4189). These designs all date to the winter of 1934/35 but they were in production certainly until the mid 1960s, possibly later.

Type 251

Type 252

Type 253

Type 254

Type 255

Snow Glaze

Tableware patterns that used the snow glaze usually have their own backstamp style, particularly the earliest productions from 1936-1938. This is type 261.

Type 261

That is enough for now! Part 3 will cover another period of change around 1938-1939, and then the restrictions on decorated pottery, (and their markings), are implemented in 1941-1942 forcing more changes. The rules are relaxed in 1952, allowing new base marks, but despite 1952 to 1974 being the youngest period in the Crown Ducal history it is also the least documented so the uncertainties are just as great.